It is not a judicial function for a judge to engage in acts that violate the U.S. Constitution, to war against the U.S. Constitution. The judge must support the Constitution.
The act of any judge to violate a person’s First, Third, Fifth and/or Fourteenth Amendment Rights, or Due Process Rights, or to permit such violation to occur, is an attack upon the Constitution, and is a crime.
Courts have consistently held that when a judge fails to support the Constitution, the judge is not acting in any judicial capacity, but is acting only in his/her personal capacity. His/her orders are void, of no legal force or effect, and he/she has been deprived of any protection of the government. He/she is amenable to personal suit, as the judge does not have judicial immunity for acts in his/her personal capacity.
Further, he/she has engaged in acts to defraud the government by his/her acceptance of any benefits from the government, whether salary, office, pension, insurance, etc.
Why does Judge Robert J. Baron violate the law, and the Constitution of the United States?
Under the Supreme Law of the Land, a judge has a duty to, and has no discretion not to, protect the Constitutional Rights of all parties before the Court. Upon the state courts, equally with Federal courts, rests the obligation to guard and enforce every right secured by the U.S. Constitution.
Letter mailed to Judge Robert J. Baron on February 20, 2004 can be found here.
CLR will be monitoring Judge Robert J. Baron, as it monitors many judges, and will report from time to time on specific instances of misconduct.