By WILLIAM
R. LEVESQUE and ANITA KUMAR
"We're
scratching our heads," one judge says of Circuit Judge Charles W. Cope's
prowling charge."We're scratching
our heads," one judge says of Circuit Judge Charles W. Cope's prowling
charge.
It
was about 20 minutes after the hour, and Pinellas-Pasco Circuit Judge Charles
W. Cope still had not arrived for an 8 a.m. class at a judicial conference
in Carmel, Calif.
When
Cope did show about 8:30, some conferees figured he slept in. Cope offered
no explanation, acting as if nothing was amiss.
"I
saw nothing out of the ordinary," said George Greer, a Pinellas-Pasco circuit
judge who attended the April 5 conference. "I detected nothing."
Cope
hadn't slept in. He may not have slept at all.
Carmel
police had arrested him hours earlier and charged him with two misdemeanors
-- prowling/loitering and peering into an occupied dwelling -- after police
say he tried to enter the hotel room of two women.
Cope,
52,
was free on $1,000 bail.
In
the three months since that arrest, Cope's problems in California were
unknown to virtually all the other judges and lawyers in the Pinellas-Pasco
circuit.
"We're
scratching our heads," said Circuit Judge Frank Quesada, a family court
judge supervised by Cope, the circuit's top family judge. "Everyone was
dumbfounded by it. I don't think anyone knew."
Hillsborough
Circuit Judge Jack Espinosa Jr. dined with Cope at the conference but had
no idea of his arrest.
"This
is news to me," said Espinosa, who learned of the charges Thursday.
Cope
did tell at least one person: Judge Susan Schaeffer, who at the time of
the arrest was the circuit's chief judge.
The
circuit's new chief judge, David Demers, said he was unaware that Cope
had been criminally charged in California.
But
at about the time he took over as chief judge on July 1, Demers said, Schaeffer
told him there had been "a problem" with Cope.
"Judge
Schaeffer said she was still handling that problem and she didn't offer
details," Demers said. "There was no need for me to know what the problem
was. She didn't get into it. And I didn't ask."
Schaeffer
refused to say what she and Cope discussed after his arrest. Cope declined
to comment.
Whether
the state's Judicial Qualifications Commission takes action against Cope
remains to be seen. The JQC, a judicial watchdog group, can suspend or
remove a judge from the bench for violating judicial canons.
Brooke
Kennerly, the JQC's executive director, said a misdemeanor charge is not
necessarily grounds for discipline, even upon a conviction. She declined
to say if the JQC is investigating Cope.
When
Cope was arrested for misdemeanor DUI in 1996 while attending a judicial
conference in Naples, he reported himself to the JQC. That charge was eventually
dismissed and the JQC took no action.
No
judge is ever under any obligation to notify the JQC about a criminal charge,
Kennerly said. She would not say if Cope reported the matter.
"We
take it on a case-by-case basis," she said. "These are allegations at this
point. People are charged. That doesn't mean they're guilty."
Cope,
meantime, is still sitting on the bench while his criminal case is pending.
He has pleaded not guilty and no trial date is yet set.
"I
think he's done a good job," said Demers. "And there's no reason to think
he won't continue to do a good job."
Neither
the JQC nor Demers would discuss what might happen if Cope were convicted
of the misdemeanors.
On
April 4, Carmel police said, Cope saw a 64-year-old Maryland woman and
her 31-year-old daughter outside their hotel. The women, whom police will
not identify, had lost a room key and Cope, who was walking by when he
noticed they were upset, tried to help them find it, police said.
An
officer who happened by said Cope and the women appeared to be intoxicated.
The
next day, the women told police that Cope unlocked their room with a key
as they slept at 12:30 a.m. They said only the door's chain lock prevented
him from entering.
One
woman looked out the window, identifying Cope. The other called 911.
Police
stopped Cope walking about a block away. They searched him and then his
room at another hotel but did not find any key.
Cope's
attorneys say Cope, who is married and has three children, did not try
to enter the room. They say the women are confusing him with someone else.
"Judge
Cope has respect for the judicial process and wants to reach an amicable
resolution without taking this to trial," said Cope's lawyer, Tom Worthington.
"This
is all a big misunderstanding."
email: clr@clr.org

Home
Page
Posted April 13, 2001