Documentation was filed with the U.S. Attorney's office relative to the bribery of Federal Judge Thomas James.
Why has U.S. Attorney James Burns not actively proceeded with a proper investigation of the bribery of this Federal Judge? Under 18 U.S.C. Section 2, James Burns is or may be a principal in the bribery scheme, or under 18 U.S.C. Section 4 he is or may be an accessory to the bribery.
At a minimum, U.S. Attorney James Burns is engaged in covering up the act of bribing Judge Thomas James, or more likely, he is a participant in the scheme of bribing Judge Thomas James.
Did Judge Thomas James report the receipt of the bribe on his 1040? Did Judge Thomas James pay income tax on his bribe?
Copyright© 1997-98 by Citizens for Legal Responsibility®. All rights reserved. email: clr@clr.org

Created June 11, 1997 Last updated November 25, 1998