CLR suggests, that whenever the judge or the government attorney has violated his/her oath to support the Constitution, all benefits received by the judge or the government attorney are based on fraud, and that all such benefits are "ill-gotten" gains. Also, all actions taken to benefit any party by the judge or the government attorney with these "ill-gotten" gains are also fraud upon the Defendant or the Plaintiff involved and/or the government. Those who may benefit from these "ill-gotten" gains, either directly or indirectly, may include the judge's and the government attorney's spouse, children, parents, in-laws, siblings, other relatives, friends, and associates.
Just as a person who is in possession of property which has been stolen is not the legal owner of the property, a person who is in possession of "ill-gotten" gains is not the legal owner of those "ill-gotten" gains. The stolen property must be returned to the legal owner; the "ill-gotten" gains should be returned to the legal owner.
The title to personal property requires a chain of proof as does the title to real property.
In criminal law the hardest case for a defense attorney is the one he must contend with in a case where his client, the defendant, is accused of being "in possession of stolen property". In such a case the only valid defense is proof of ownership of the goods in question. The burden is on the party who may have "ill-gotten gains" in their possession to prove that they have not received any "ill-gotten gains".
The following is a list of some of the persons who may have received some of the "ill-gotten" gains obtained from defrauding the government by Justice Mary Jane Theis:
John T. Theis John Kenneth Theis Claire Theis Kenneth Wendt family related to Mary Jane Theis
Copyright© 2000 by Citizens for Legal Responsibility®. All rights reserved.
email: clr@clr.org
