TRANSCRIPT OF SIRACUSA'S RECUSAL HEARING NAME="KEYWORDS" CONTENT="FRANK M. SIRACUSA, CHUHAK & TECSON, JAMES W. NAISBITT, FAGEL & HABER, ALVIN MEYERS">

IN RE:                        )

ESTATE OF HARRY KALISH,       )

               Deceased       )

RENEE KALISH and MICHAEL      )

KALISH,                       )

               Plaintiffs,    )

          vs.                 )    No. 93 P 1080

MARGARET KALISH, etc, et al., )

               Defendants     )


          TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS had in the

above-entitled cause on the 25th day of June,

A.D. 1997, at approximately 10:00 a.m.


BEFORE:   HONORABLE FRANK M. SIRACUSA


APPEARANCES: CHUHAK & TECSON, (225 West Washington Street, Chicago, Illinois 60606), by: MR. JAMES W. NAISBITT, appeared on behalf of Renee Kalish; FAGEL & HABER, (140 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603), by: MR. ALVIN MEYERS, appeared on behalf of Margaret Kalish. ALSO PRESENT: MS. RENEE KALISH.
MR. MEYERS: Good morning, your Honor. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. MEYERS: Alvin Meyers on behalf of the estate. RENEE KALISH: Good morning, Renee Kalish. MR. NAISBITT: Good morning, Judge. James Naisbitt of Chuhak & Tecson on behalf of the movant in connection with the motion to withdraw. THE COURT: All right. Before you begin, you have all identified yourselves of record. I know who you all are. I have my own order prepared. I am recusing myself from this cause for the reasons stated in my order. I am going to sign my order. You'll each be provided with a copy of it. The presiding judge will reassign this case to another judge. You'll know about that, I suppose, sometime later today after he makes that reassignment. So I'll sign the original. MR. MEYERS: Before your Honor signs the order, may I ask the nature or the reason for the recusal? THE COURT: It will be stated in my order. You can read my order. Because I have been delivered communications, personal communications between the party participant in this matter between themselves and attorneys they were attempting to hire. Those personal communications discussed the conduct and the activity in this case. For that reason, I am recusing myself, but I will give you leave to file all of the documents that you have presented to me as courtesy copies. There were -- MR. MEYERS: I didn't receive anything, your Honor. MS. RENEE KALISH: They were all mailed to you. MR. MEYERS: Well, when were they mailed? THE COURT: Here is what I got, counsel. The first thing I received on or about June 16th was a notice of termination for cause together with a notice filing that notice of termination with exhibits attached A to H. MR. MEYERS: I never received it. THE COURT: Which were personal communications between the pro se litigants and attorneys. And after that I received a motion to withdraw as counsel and extend time to file a second amended complaint. That was yesterday. And today I received notice of return of refundable retainer and case file. MR. MEYERS: Which I never received. MS. RENEE KALISH: I mailed it to you yesterday. THE COURT: Those things will all be made apart of the record. MR. MEYERS: How can it get to me today if it was mailed yesterday? Your Honor, the reason I say this is I think the whole purpose in sending these documents to you was to cause this very event and I -- THE COURT: Counsel, respectfully, sir, I am recusing myself from this matter. I want nothing further to do with any of the party participants in this matter. My order is succinct, complete and legally signed by me and the clerk will direct documents sending this to the presiding judge for reassignment. MR. MEYERS: Is there motion to withdraw granted within the order, your Honor? THE COURT: No, I am not acting on anything presented by the attorneys and by the parties' participant in these personal communications between themselves. I don't want to act on any of these matters for that reason. They were personal communications between parties, the litigant and attorneys. So I am out of the case and I wish you well all of you. MS. RENEE KALISH: Thank you. MR. NAISBITT: Thank you very much, your Honor. MR. MEYERS: They are still in the case? THE COURT: I don't know who is in the case, counsel, because I am not acting on their motion to withdraw. MR. MEYERS: I see. THE COURT: The other judge to whom the case is assigned will act on that and I suppose if they -- if people want to withdraw and I think Ms. Kalish wants them out. MS. RENEE KALISH: Yes, judge, I have terminated them. THE COURT: I see no reason why they would be in it, but, you know, I am not acting on that. MR. MEYERS: There is no order in that respect? THE COURT: No order. The only order this morning is that noting that all of these matters that I received by courtesy copy are filed, made part of the record and then my order which I just entered on my own motion. Okay? MR. MEYERS: Will we get a copy of that now? MS. RENEE KALISH: I mailed it to you. MR. MEYERS: No. I am talking about his order. THE COURT: Brenda, they will need to get a copy of my order and then you will prepare forms to send to the presiding judge for reassignment. THE CLERK: Yes, judge. MR. NAISBITT: Thank you. THE COURT: Do you want your courtesy copies back? Do any of you want these courtesy copies back or were they just for my use? MS. RENEE KALISH: They were just for you. MR. MEYERS: Since I haven't received them, I would like a set. MS. RENEE KALISH: They were mailed to you yesterday. If the judge would like to give it to you, he may. I have no objection. THE COURT: I am not giving anybody anything. I will give you back each of your own documents that you provided me and you can provide them as you see fit to whomever you like. MS. RENEE KALISH: Thank you. THE COURT: That's yours too and this belongs to I think your office. MR. NAISBITT: Judge, may I have our notice of motion stamped? THE COURT: Sure. You can file those today. Call the next case. (WHICH WERE ALL THE PROCEEDINGS HAD IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CAUSE ON THIS DATE.)
email: clr@clr.org Go to Home Page
Last updated July 2, 1997