TRANSCRIPT OF SIRACUSA'S RECUSAL HEARING
NAME="KEYWORDS" CONTENT="FRANK M. SIRACUSA, CHUHAK & TECSON, JAMES W. NAISBITT, FAGEL & HABER, ALVIN MEYERS">
IN RE: )
ESTATE OF HARRY KALISH, )
Deceased )
RENEE KALISH and MICHAEL )
KALISH, )
Plaintiffs, )
vs. ) No. 93 P 1080
MARGARET KALISH, etc, et al., )
Defendants )
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS had in the
above-entitled cause on the 25th day of June,
A.D. 1997, at approximately 10:00 a.m.
BEFORE: HONORABLE FRANK M. SIRACUSA
APPEARANCES:
CHUHAK & TECSON,
(225 West Washington Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60606), by:
MR. JAMES W. NAISBITT,
appeared on behalf of Renee Kalish;
FAGEL & HABER,
(140 South Dearborn Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60603), by:
MR. ALVIN MEYERS,
appeared on behalf of Margaret Kalish.
ALSO PRESENT:
MS. RENEE KALISH.
MR. MEYERS: Good morning, your Honor.
THE COURT: Good morning.
MR. MEYERS: Alvin Meyers on behalf of the
estate.
RENEE KALISH: Good morning, Renee
Kalish.
MR. NAISBITT: Good morning, Judge. James
Naisbitt of Chuhak & Tecson on behalf of
the movant in connection with the motion to
withdraw.
THE COURT: All right. Before you begin,
you have all identified yourselves of record. I
know who you all are. I have my own order
prepared.
I am recusing myself from this cause
for the reasons stated in my order. I am going
to sign my order. You'll each be provided with a
copy of it. The presiding judge will reassign
this case to another judge. You'll know about
that, I suppose, sometime later today after he
makes that reassignment. So I'll sign the
original.
MR. MEYERS: Before your Honor signs the
order, may I ask the nature or the reason for the
recusal?
THE COURT: It will be stated in my order.
You can read my order. Because I have been
delivered communications, personal communications
between the party participant in this matter
between themselves and attorneys they were
attempting to hire. Those personal
communications discussed the conduct and the
activity in this case. For that reason, I am
recusing myself, but I will give you leave to
file all of the documents that you have presented
to me as courtesy copies. There were --
MR. MEYERS: I didn't receive anything, your
Honor.
MS. RENEE KALISH: They were all mailed to
you.
MR. MEYERS: Well, when were they mailed?
THE COURT: Here is what I got, counsel.
The first thing I received on or about June 16th
was a notice of termination for cause together
with a notice filing that notice of termination
with exhibits attached A to H.
MR. MEYERS: I never received it.
THE COURT: Which were personal
communications between the pro se litigants and
attorneys. And after that I received a motion to
withdraw as counsel and extend time to file a
second amended complaint. That was yesterday.
And today I received notice of return of
refundable retainer and case file.
MR. MEYERS: Which I never received.
MS. RENEE KALISH: I mailed it to you
yesterday.
THE COURT: Those things will all be made
apart of the record.
MR. MEYERS: How can it get to me today if
it was mailed yesterday?
Your Honor, the reason I say this is I
think the whole purpose in sending these
documents to you was to cause this very event and
I --
THE COURT: Counsel, respectfully, sir, I am
recusing myself from this matter. I want nothing
further to do with any of the party participants
in this matter. My order is succinct, complete
and legally signed by me and the clerk will
direct documents sending this to the presiding
judge for reassignment.
MR. MEYERS: Is there motion to withdraw
granted within the order, your Honor?
THE COURT: No, I am not acting on anything
presented by the attorneys and by the parties'
participant in these personal communications
between themselves. I don't want to act on any
of these matters for that reason. They were
personal communications between parties, the
litigant and attorneys. So I am out of the case
and I wish you well all of you.
MS. RENEE KALISH: Thank you.
MR. NAISBITT: Thank you very much, your
Honor.
MR. MEYERS: They are still in the case?
THE COURT: I don't know who is in the case,
counsel, because I am not acting on their motion
to withdraw.
MR. MEYERS: I see.
THE COURT: The other judge to whom the case
is assigned will act on that and I suppose if
they -- if people want to withdraw and I think
Ms. Kalish wants them out.
MS. RENEE KALISH: Yes, judge, I have
terminated them.
THE COURT: I see no reason why they would
be in it, but, you know, I am not acting on that.
MR. MEYERS: There is no order in that
respect?
THE COURT: No order. The only order this
morning is that noting that all of these matters
that I received by courtesy copy are filed, made
part of the record and then my order which I just
entered on my own motion. Okay?
MR. MEYERS: Will we get a copy of that
now?
MS. RENEE KALISH: I mailed it to you.
MR. MEYERS: No. I am talking about his
order.
THE COURT: Brenda, they will need to get a
copy of my order and then you will prepare forms
to send to the presiding judge for reassignment.
THE CLERK: Yes, judge.
MR. NAISBITT: Thank you.
THE COURT: Do you want your courtesy copies
back? Do any of you want these courtesy copies
back or were they just for my use?
MS. RENEE KALISH: They were just for you.
MR. MEYERS: Since I haven't received them,
I would like a set.
MS. RENEE KALISH: They were mailed to you
yesterday. If the judge would like to give it to
you, he may. I have no objection.
THE COURT: I am not giving anybody
anything. I will give you back each of your own
documents that you provided me and you can
provide them as you see fit to whomever you
like.
MS. RENEE KALISH: Thank you.
THE COURT: That's yours too and this
belongs to I think your office.
MR. NAISBITT: Judge, may I have our notice
of motion stamped?
THE COURT: Sure. You can file those
today.
Call the next case.
(WHICH WERE ALL THE PROCEEDINGS
HAD IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CAUSE ON
THIS DATE.)
email: clr@clr.org
Go to Home Page
Last updated July 2, 1997